Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Discussion 1_1666695...
I believe silicon based life could be possible on other planets, low chance of it happening yes, but with right conditions and solving the issue of no O2, seeing as silicon wouldn't be the only thing...

Discussion 1
Discussion 1

I believe silicon based life could be possible on

Week 6 Discussion (T...
There are specific rules which are designed by an organization are prompted by the SME in the implementation phase of the training (SME Best Practices). These rules ensure that the trainees can become...

Week 6 Discussion (Topics 1 and 2)
Week 6 Discussion (Topics 1 and 2)

There are specific rules which are designed by an

Discussion 5.1 Film...
Orson Welles was master craftsman and he believed that if the sound is going to be right then the movie is going to look right. It is a well-known fact that he developed the concept of deep focus phot...

Discussion 5.1 Film Sound in Citizen Kane
Discussion 5.1 Film Sound in Citizen Kane

Orson Welles was master craftsman and he believed

Good source

Good source

Q 1. Pick a subject to research in either Academic Search Premier or ProQuest Direct--on any topic. This does not have to be literary. 2. Find an example of a good source for your topic. 3. Then use a "regular" search engine of your choice (Google, Firefox, Internet Explorer, etc.) and find an example of a bad source for the same topic. 4. Finally, using criteria from "Identifying Fake News," explain what criteria you used to determine the legitimacy of each source. How and why do you consider your good example a good source and your bad example of the same topic a bad source? DUE DATE: Submit both examples (the "good" and the "bad") and your critique reasoning by midnight, Sunday, Feb. 3.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
A lot of things can be noticed in the two sources mentioned above which made me choose which one is good and which one is not. The first thing that one should notice in a source is the name of the author. In the first source the name of the authors are mentioned along with their qualification and other details which make this a credible source. For the second source no such thing is there. There are information in the second source also but reliability is zero without the name of the writer. The first source was published in a scholarly peer-reviewed journal which confirms that the information provided in that is absolutely genuine. This is simply not the case for the second source and the information provided can be fake or false also.